• stormtrooper

Posts1135

The new normal46.27
When we first started writing about startups at TechCrunch the idea of a startup – a small business with global ambitions – was a pipe dream. How could a side hustle like Twitter turn into a mouthpiece for heroes and villains? How could a video uploading service like YouTube destroy the media industry? How could a blog – a blog written by a perpetually exhausted ex-lawyer from his bedroom – upturn...
Georgios Konstantopoulos
@gakonst

I've just published: "Plasma Cash: Towards more efficient Plasma Constructions"

An all in one compilation from the community's research and development on Plasma Cash, outlining its features and how it can be further improved in the future.

github.com/loomnetwork/pl…

  • 2 months ago
  • 52
  • 186
  • 435

Would love your input. More revisions to come!

@jcp @VitalikButerin @technocrypto @kelvinfichter @danrobinson @lixuanji @ben_chain @haydenzadams @karl_dot_tech @NathanGinnever

  • 2 months ago
  • 0
  • 2
  • 2
Monero Developer’s New Startup is Launching a Free Blockchain University32.52
South African blockchain startup Tari Labs has unveiled a free online university that makes training accessible to local and international blockchain developers. Tari was developed and launched earlier this year by local blockchain expert and Monero promoter Riccardo Spagni alongside American investors, Naiveen Jain and Dan Teree. Reasoning Behind New Project Tari particularly aims to readdress
Charlie Lee [LTC⚡]
@satoshilite

1/ On-chain Bitcoin and Litecoin payments are not peer-to-peer. Payments are sent from sender to miners, who record it on a distributed ledger. The recipient receives the payment when it's recorded. BUT, this is facilitated by a p2p network where transactions are broadcasted.

  • 2 months ago
  • 465
  • 1519
  • 4320

2/ The broadcast network IS p2p, but strictly speaking payments are not p2p. The sender can ignore the p2p network and directly communicate the transaction to miners to send payments. The sender doesn't have to have any communication with the recipient in any p2p manner at all!

  • 2 months ago
  • 53
  • 305
  • 575

3/ This is actually a good thing as the recipient doesn't have to be online to receive payments. Ironically, on chain payments resembles more closely to a hub and spoke model where the mining pools are the hubs and users just need to connect to those hubs to send payments.

  • 2 months ago
  • 55
  • 277
  • 535

4/ Lightning network payments, on the other hand, are p2p payments. They are sometimes direct p2p, sometimes indirect p2p. LN payments have to be sent from peer to peer to get from the sender to the recipient. Both have to be online, just like other p2p networks like BitTorrent.

  • 2 months ago
  • 69
  • 339
  • 678

5/ Because LN payments are peer-to-peer, they can work if the peers involved are disconnected from the rest of the internet. The sender can even send payments directly to the recipient by just having a direct connection without relying on any other parties at all.

  • 2 months ago
  • 67
  • 429
  • 764

6/6 Bitcoin with Lightning Network more closely fits the Bitcoin whitepaper's title: "A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." This is Satoshi's Vision.

  • 2 months ago
  • 255
  • 1204
  • 2854

PS. Early Bitcoin clients had a send to IP feature (in addition to send to address) that lets you make p2p payments. This was removed in subsequent clients. LN actually brings back p2p payments to Bitcoin, while making it more scalable, more flexible, more private, and cheaper!

  • 2 months ago
  • 93
  • 432
  • 825

Comments2