Richard MacManus

  • ricmac
  • Wellington, New Zealand
  • Head of content at Blocktimes; previously founder & CEO of ReadWriteWeb.
Head of content at Blocktimes; previously founder & CEO of ReadWriteWeb.

Social links

Posts35

'Doctor Doom' vs Crypto: Here's What to Expect in Congress Today

Famed economist Nouriel Roubini plans to strike a fiery tone on cryptocurrency and blockchain before a group of U.S. senators on Thursday.

Roubini will testify before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs alongside Coin Center director of research Peter Van Valkenburgh in a hearing entitled "Exploring the Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Ecosystem."

Why Big Time VC Chris Dixon Is Betting on A Decentralized Internet0.01

For me, the most interesting part of blockchain technology is that you can provide much richer and more advanced protocols. They have the best features of Web One in that they’re governed in a decentralized way, and in a way that the rules are fixed and people can build on them and invest in them and know that the rules won’t change. But they have more advanced functionality than protocols of the Web One era.

The Bull Case For Ethereum0.01
Spencer Noon 🕛
@spencernoon

I hopped on @eriktorenberg’s Venture Stories podcast with @cyounessi1 and @tonysheng to discuss my investment thesis on Ether as well as—

• Open Finance
• the new “Blockchain not Bitcoin”
• why Ethereum can already scale today
• and much more!

spreaker.com/user/10197011/…

  • 2 months ago
  • 24
  • 108
  • 144

With mentions of some of my favorite projects in the space:

@graphprotocol
@0xProject
@SpankChain
@statechannels
@loomnetwork
@MakerDAO
@DharmaProtocol
@AugurProject

  • 2 months ago
  • 0
  • 16
  • 14.4
Dapps are experiments in incentivizing new behaviors0.02
Nathaniel Whittemore
@nlw

1/ Dapps are experiments in incentivizing new behaviors. Those dapps trying to replace centralized services have to create benefits that outweigh the immense costs of leaving current, dominant networks. To do this, we have to start by asking the right questions.

Thread 👇

  • 4 months ago
  • 26
  • 54
  • 89

2/ First, let’s look at dapps as experiments in incentives that organize behavior.
Experiment: can you design an economic community around people voluntarily participating in a transparently ponzi-style casino game?

twitter.com/eeril/status/1…

+

twitter.com/KyleSamani/sta…

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7

3/ Experiment: can we translate the human impulse to collect and the psychological reward of ownership translate to digital goods, even when there is zero marginal cost of replication?

twitter.com/sarthakgh/stat…

+

twitter.com/Disruptepreneu…

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 4
  • 8

4/ Experiment: does adding a financial incentive to content curation + creation provide sufficient motivation to switch away the thoroughly established network effects of centralized services?

twitter.com/BitcoinPosse/s…

+

twitter.com/VitalikButerin…

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 6
  • 9

5/ This last one has me particularly interested. A dapp meant to replace a centralized service is making an argument that the incentives it offers and the new value it creates are greater than the loss of leaving the mainstream network. That’s bold in the attention economy.

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 8
  • 10

6/ Dapps trying to do this have to answer 3 questions around 1) costs of centralization; 2) UX parity; 3) new value above and beyond the existing network.

  • 4 months ago
  • 3
  • 6
  • 19

7/
1. Are the costs of the centralized service meaningfully high to a large group of users?
2. What aspects of the user experience require parity for those users to switch?
3. What additional value add (beyond eliminating centralized costs) are required to grow the network?

  • 4 months ago
  • 2
  • 7
  • 13

8/ Each of these 3 questions reflect barriers to adoption. If costs aren’t perceived as high, there are no user prospects. If the UX is horrible, the dapp won't get traction. No new incentives beyond ripping out the bad stuff? Low growth incentive. twitter.com/APompliano/sta…

  • 4 months ago
  • 2
  • 7
  • 15

9/ Looking at things through this lens, certain categories of “costs" that come with participating in centralized networks are going to be more able to convince users to switch than others, with privacy on one end of the spectrum and real $$ costs on the other.

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 3
  • 6

10/ This thread with @arjunblj talks about how even major data scandals have had almost no impact on consumers decisions to leave FB and other major social media networks. Privacy seems low on the spectrum of “costs” for centralized networks. twitter.com/arjunblj/statu…

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 3
  • 7

11/ On the other hand, when network effects monopolies cost users actual money, there is more opportunity. The proportion of Amazon sales from 3rd parties just keeps going up, but so too do their transaction fees, squeezing margins. That feels disruptable. medium.com/@KMElle/how-am…

  • 4 months ago
  • 2
  • 4
  • 13

12/ Of course, there may also be some times when privacy costs and $ costs intersect - for example, private property owners who don’t want to let Google map their spaces because they know 3D data is an asset.

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 2
  • 6

13/ It’s also worth noting that there is likely to be even more of a difference between most Dapp’s crypto-native early adopters (who may truly care about privacy, etc) and their prospective mass audience than in previous consumer products (who likely don't).

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 4
  • 8

14/ Let’s be clear: this whole decentralization thing is really, really hard. In fact, @backus just published an essay on “Minimum Viable Decentralization” drawing from the lessons of the past 25+ years that shows just how hard it is. medium.com/@jbackus/minim…

  • 4 months ago
  • 3
  • 8
  • 22

15/ Summing up: companies that are creating decentralized versions of centralized services are running experiments in incentives. To have any chance of success, those incentives have to outweigh the costs of switching away from major networks.

  • 4 months ago
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25

16/ Still, it’s early days and there are lots of reasons to be optimistic. Which of today’s centralized services do you think has the most potential to be disrupted? What types of activity won’t be possible until dapps get them right? twitter.com/AriannaSimpson…

  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • 5
  • 10